What each one is for
Dux-Soup’s original and still best use case is visiting profiles at scale. Visit a few hundred relevant people a week, a proportion look back at you, and some of those start a conversation. It is low risk, low effort and quietly effective as a background activity.
Prospectio is built for the case where outbound is how the company generates pipeline, and every prospect is worth a considered approach.
Side by side
| Prospectio | Dux-Soup | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Cloud, residential IP per account | Chrome extension (Turbo) or cloud (Cloud tier) |
| Runs unattended | Yes | Only on the Cloud tier |
| Qualifies prospects first | Yes | No |
| Personalisation | Profile-based opener, voice, video | Merge fields |
| Reply handling | AI responder books meetings | None |
| Profile visiting at scale | Yes, as a warm-up action | Yes, its core strength |
| Price | $99 per seat per month | Low, tiers from a few dollars |
Where Dux-Soup wins
Price, by a distance. Simplicity, if a small feature set is what you want. And profile visiting specifically, which it has done longer than anyone.
Where Prospectio wins
Reply rate, because of the format change from text to voice and video. Account safety, because of the cloud and residential IP architecture. And what happens after a prospect replies, which Dux-Soup leaves entirely to you.
How to decide
If LinkedIn outreach is something you do around the edges of another job, Dux-Soup at low volume is a rational choice. If it is how the company finds customers, the price difference stops being the relevant number and cost per booked meeting starts being it.