HomeComparisonsProspectio vs Expandi: which is right for your team?
Comparison

Prospectio vs Expandi: which is right for your team?

Expandi has been a safe, well-built LinkedIn tool since 2019. Its personalisation trick was clever in 2022. Here's how it stacks up against a tool built around voice, video and qualification in 2026.

Paul CassidyBy Paul Cassidy, founder of Prospectio.ai. Ex Google, Salesforce and Twilio sales leader. Updated 4 September 2026.
In short: Expandi and Prospectio cost about the same per seat. Expandi gives you safe, solid text sequences with image and GIF personalisation and a mature feature set. Prospectio gives you ICP qualification before sending, cloned voice and video instead of text, and an AI responder that books the meeting. Pick Expandi for breadth of sequencing features; pick Prospectio for reply rate and meetings.

Background

Expandi is one of the longer-standing cloud LinkedIn automation tools, launched in 2019 and known for a careful approach to account safety. It introduced “smart sequences” (branching logic based on prospect behaviour) and image personalisation that put the prospect’s name or company logo onto a picture. Both were ahead of their time.

Prospectio is newer and narrower in ambition. It does three things: qualify the prospect, send a message that sounds like a human, and reply until the meeting is booked. It doesn’t try to be a full sequencing platform with every feature.

Side by side

ProspectioExpandi
ICP qualification before sendingYes, per profileNo
PersonalisationProfile-based opener; cloned voice and videoToken merge; dynamic images and GIFs
Message formatsText, voice, video, emailText, InMail, images/GIFs, email
Branching sequencesYes, based on accept/replyYes, smart sequences with more conditions
AI replies and bookingYesNo
Account safetyResidential IP per account, mobile-style API, conservative limitsDedicated IP, cloud, sensible limits
Agency / multi-accountTeam plansStrong agency features, whitelabel
Price (at time of writing)$99 per seat per month, annualAround $99 per seat per month; check expandi.io

Where Expandi wins

  • You run complex conditional sequences and want more branching options.
  • You’re an agency managing many client accounts and want whitelabel reporting.
  • Image personalisation still works in your niche (it does in some, particularly where prospects see less outbound).

Where Prospectio wins

  • The reply rate is the problem. Voice and video lift it in a way images no longer do, in our campaign data.
  • You want fewer wasted sends. The ICP filter typically skips a meaningful share of a raw list.
  • You want replies handled and meetings booked without a human checking the inbox all day.
  • You want someone to build your first campaign with you rather than a knowledge base.

The honest summary

If you already have Expandi and your reply rates are fine, there is no reason to move. If you’re choosing today and your goal is meetings from a mid-sized list of the right people, Prospectio’s approach is built for exactly that.

Frequently asked questions

Is Expandi safe to use?

Expandi's safety record is one of its strengths: cloud-based, dedicated IP, sensible limits. Prospectio takes a similar approach and adds the ICP filter, which reduces ignored invitations, another signal LinkedIn watches.

What is Expandi's image personalisation?

Expandi can generate images and GIFs with the prospect's name or logo placed on them (the coffee-cup logo is the famous one). It stood out a few years ago. Most prospects have now seen it, and it doesn't carry the reply-rate lift it once did.

Which is cheaper?

They're priced similarly per seat at time of writing (around $99). The difference is what's included: Prospectio's price covers voice and video cloning, the ICP filter and the AI responder.

See it on your own pipeline

Book a 20-minute demo or start a free trial. No card needed.