The numbers
| Measure | DACH | Dataset average |
|---|---|---|
| Prospects contacted | 63,800 | 389,890 total |
| Reply rate | 32.4% | 31.9% |
| Meeting rate | 4.7% | 4.6% |
| Rank on reply rate | 4th of 9 | – |
| Rank on meeting rate | 4th of 9 | – |
What the data says about this market
DACH is fourth of nine at 32.4 percent replies and 4.7 percent meetings across 63,800 prospects, and it is the region that most needs its own version of the message rather than a translated one.
Two things came out of our DACH programmes consistently. The tone has to be formal. The casual opener that works in the UK and the Nordics costs you replies here, and the correct register is closer to a written business letter than a LinkedIn message. Second, voice notes underperformed. The format that lifted meetings from 4.1 to 5.0 percent elsewhere did not carry, and we stopped recommending it as a default in this region.
Everything else in the playbook held. Length, the question-led structure, naming a competitor and the 24-hour response rule all worked as they did everywhere else. It is the register that changes, not the mechanics.
All nine regions
| Region | Prospects | Reply rate | Meeting rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| UK & Ireland | 68,300 | 35.1% | 5.2% |
| Nordics | 38,900 | 34.6% | 5.0% |
| CEE | 41,400 | 33.8% | 4.9% |
| DACH | 63,800 | 32.4% | 4.7% |
| Benelux | 36,090 | 31.2% | 4.4% |
| Iberia | 18,800 | 30.5% | 4.3% |
| France | 32,200 | 29.8% | 4.1% |
| US East | 58,600 | 28.9% | 4.0% |
| US West | 31,800 | 27.6% | 3.8% |
What does not change by region
The mechanics held everywhere we ran them. A connection request beat InMail by ten times. Two and a half sentences, question-led, with no pitch beat the longer version by 2.4 times. Messages of 240 to 420 characters peaked at 38.6 percent replies. Replies answered inside 24 hours converted at 21.4 percent against 3.6 percent after 48 hours.
What changes by region is register and pace, not structure. DACH needs a formal tone and voice notes underperform there. France needs the message written in French by someone who speaks it, and a longer runway. Everywhere else, the same playbook applied without modification.
Method
Figures come from 63,800 prospects in this region inside a dataset of 389,890 prospects and 15,018 meetings, run for 17 clients across 41 programmes between 2018 and 2026. Prospects were split at random inside each client account so industry, geography, seniority and company size are held constant on both sides of every controlled test.
Full method and all fifteen tests are on the 2026 outbound benchmarks page. See also the breakdowns by persona and company size.
Benchmark your own campaign against this segment, with the figures above pre-loaded. No sign-up.
Cite this page as: Prospectio.ai, B2B outbound benchmarks in DACH, 63,800 prospects, 2018 to 2026.